An Analysis of Subjectum Litis and Objectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court

Anna Triningsih; Nuzul Qur’aini Mardiya

doi:10.31078/consrev325

An Analysis of Subjectum Litis and Objectum Litis on Dispute about the Authority of State Institution from the Verdicts of the Constitutional Court

Anna Triningsih, Nuzul Qur’aini Mardiya

Abstract

The relationship of mutual control and balance between state institutions gives an opportunity for the emergence of the dispute about the authority of state institutions, especially the dispute about the constitutional authority. In relation to a dispute about authority of state institutions given by the 1945 constitution, a judicial institution is used to resolve the dispute. That judicial institution is the Constitutional Court. The court can evaluate the subjectum litis and objectum litis from the dispute about the authority of state institutions. Therefore that matter will be resolved definitively by the verdict of the Constitutional Court where the verdict is permanent and binding, then later it will become a jurisprudence, and it will be used as a reference. There are eight verdicts of the Constitutional Court related to disputes about the authority of state institutions which are related to the subjectum litis and objectum litis, such as: The verdict of The Consitutional Court No.004/SKLN-IV/2006; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No.030/SKLN-IV/2006; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 26/SKLN-V/2007; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 27/SKLN-VI/2008; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 1/SKLN-VIII/2010; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 2/SKLN-IX/2011; the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 5/SKLN-IX/2011; and the verdict of the Consitutional Court No. 2/SKLN-X/2012.

Keywords

Subjectum Litis; Objectum Litis; Authority Dispute

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ekatjahjana, Widodo, and Totok Sudaryanto. Sumber Hukum Tata Negara Formal Di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2001.

Fadjar, Abdul Mukthie. Hukum Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

Firmansyah, Arifin. Lembaga Negara Dan Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara. Jakarta: Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional (KRHN), 2005.

Hakim, Lukman. “Konsorsium Reformasi Hukum Nasional (KRHN).” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 80 (2010).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by Drs. Aziz Kharie, ME (as the Chairman of the General Election Commissions of North Maluku and as the mandate holder of the General Election Commissions) against the President of the Republic of Indonesia (as the Respondent), No. 27/SKLN-VI/2008 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2008).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by Drs. H. M. Saleh Manaf (the Regent of Bekasi) and Drs. Solihin Sari (Vice Regent of Bekasi) againts the President of the Republic of Indonesia (Respondent I), Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia (Respondent II), and the Regional People Representatives Council of Bekasi Regency (Respondent III), No. 004/SKLN-IV/2006 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2006).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by H. Andi Harahap, S.Sos (as the Regent of North Penajam Paser) and Nanang Ali, S.E (as the head of the Regional People Representatives Council of North Penajam Paser Regency) against the Minister of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia as the Respondent, No. 2/SKLN-IX/2011 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2011).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (as a Petitioner) against the President of the Republic of Indonesia q.q. the Minister of Communications and Informatics (as the Respondent), No. 030/SKLN-IV/2006 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2006).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by Ir.H. Abdullah Tuasikal, M.Si (as the Regent of Central Maluku) and Asis Mahulette, S.H (as the head of the Regional People Representatives Council of Central Maluku Regency) against the Respondent, the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia., No. 1/SKLNVIII/2010 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2010).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by the Independent Election Commission of Southeast Aceh Regency level (Petitioner I) and the Regional People Representatives Council (Petitioner II) against the Independent Election Commission of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Province level (Respondent I), the Governor of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (Respondent II), and the President of Republic of Indonesia c.q the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia (Respondent III)., No. 26/SKLN-V/2007 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2007).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by the President against the Respondent, the People Representatives Council and the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia, No. 2/SKLN-X/2012 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2012).

Judicial Review on Dispute over the authority of State Institutions whose authorities are granted by the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, filed by the Working Committee of Indonesian Advocate (KKAI) against the Supreme Court of Indonesia as the Respondent., No. 5/SKLN-IX/2011 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2011).

Latif, Abdul. Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. “Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Sekretaris Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

———. “Sengketa Kewenangan Antarlembaga Negara.” Jakarta, 2008.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945).

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Constitutional Court Regulation (n.d.).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev325