Constitutional Tort as A Constitutional Complaint: Reconstructing Governmental Unlawful Acts Regulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1216Keywords:
Constitutional Tort, Constitutional Complaint, Governmental Unlawful ActsAbstract
A chorus of academics has echoed constitutional complaint as an expansion of the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction to strengthen the protection of citizens. In this context, the proposal is hampered by the procedural barriers of constitutional amendment. Therefore, this research aims to propose a more viable alternative by reconstructing the existing State Administrative Courts’ governmental unlawful acts jurisdiction into a de facto constitutional complaint mechanism. Governmental unlawful acts cause of action is reconstructed by adopting certain aspects of constitutional tort in the United States as a point of comparison and inspiration. This doctrinal research adopts statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, using primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that reconstruction of State Administrative Courts’ governmental unlawful acts jurisdiction into a de facto constitutional complaint mechanism depends on four specific and crucial reforms to State Administrative Courts Law, the Governmental Administration Law, and the implementing regulations. First, the authority of State Administrative Courts covers factual actions and includes blocking the enforcement of written state administrative decisions. Second, an explicit statutory authorization should be provided for the state administrative court judges to use the 1945 Constitution as a standard of rseview. Third, there needs to be procedural safeguards to ensure legal certainty and consistency in constitutional interpretation. State Administrative Courts are obligated to give full effect to the Constitutional Court's interpretation whenever available and applicable to the case at hand, and to stay proceedings when a related case is pending at the Constitutional Court relevant to the case at hand. Lastly. Finally, existing damages regulations must be amended to ensure legal certainty and provide just relief. This prevents remedies from becoming symbolic rather than effective in stopping constitutional violations and wrongdoings.
References
Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian, Xavier Nugraha, and Nathanael Grady. “Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 [Development of Lawsuit for Law Violation by the Government Post Law Number 30 of 2014].” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 11, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v11i1.1574.
Alexander, Larry, and Frederick Schauer. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110, no. 7 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/1342175.
Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Pembatasan Pengajuan Perkara Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Jaminan Keamanan Nasional [Restrictions on Filing Regional Head Election Result Disputes in the Constitutional Court and Their Implications for National Security Guarantees].” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 5, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i1.6.
Arundhati, Gautama Budi. “Kemungkinan Penerapan Preliminary Ruling Procedure Sebagai Media Constitutional Complaint Di Mahkamah Konstitusi [The Possibility of Applying a Preliminary Ruling Procedure as a Means of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court].” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1446.
Arwanto, Bambang. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Akibat Tindakan Faktual Pemerintah [Legal Protection for the People Resulting from Factual Government Actions].” Yuridika 31, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i3.4857.
Bandes, Susan. “Reinventing Bivens: The Self-Executing Constitution.” Southern California Law Review 68 (1995). https://via.library.depaul.edu/lawfacpubs/1535/.
Barnes, Bailey D. “The Constitution’s Waning Enforceability: Constitutional Torts After Egbert & Vega.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 50, no. 1 (2023). https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs/1292.
Barokah, Muhamad Raziv, and Anna Erliyana. “Pergeseran Kompetensi Absolut Dari Peradilan Umum Ke Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Penguasa (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad [unlawful acts by the government]) [The Shift of Absolute Competence from the General Courts to the State Administrative Courts: Claims for Unlawful Acts by the Authorities].” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3290.
Bhat, P. Ishwara. Idea and Methods of Legal Research. Oxford University Press, 2019.
Butt, Simon, Melissa Crouch, and Rosalind Dixon. “Special Issue: The First Decade of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court.” Australian Journal of Asian Law 16, no. 2 (2016). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2745100.
Chakim, M. Lutfi. “A Comparative Perspective on Constitutional Complaint: Discussing Models, Procedures, and Decisions.” Constitutional Review 5, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev514.
Chandra, M. Jeffri Arlinandes, Bayu Dwi Anggono, and Febrian Febrian. “Rekonsruksi Tahapan Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan: Urgensi Re-Harmonisasi Dan Evaluasi Sebagai Siklus Pembentukan Undang-Undangan Yang Berkualitas [Reconstruction of the Stages of Lawmaking: The Urgency of Reharmonization and Evaluation as a Cycle of Quality Lawmaking].” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 19, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i4.980.
Chipalkatti, Aseem. “A Backdoor Bivens Remedy: State Civil Rights Torts and the Federal Tort Claims Act.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 23, no. 5 (2021). https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jcl/vol23/iss5/6.
Christiani, Theresia Anita. “Normative and Empirical Research Methods: Their Usefulness and Relevance in the Study of Law as an Object.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006.
Collins, Josua Satria, and Pan Mohamad Faiz. “Penambahan Kewenangan Constitutional Question Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Upaya Untuk Melindungi Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara [Adding Constitutional Question Authority to the Constitutional Court as an Effort to Protect Citizens’ Constitutional Rights].” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1541.
Crocker, Katherine Mims. “A Scapegoat Theory of Bivens.” Notre Dame Law Review 96, no. 5 (2021). https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss5/7.
Crocker, Katherine Mims. “Constitutional Rights and Remedial Consistency.” Virginia Law Review 110, no. 3 (2024). https://virginialawreview.org/articles/constitutional-rights-and-remedial-consistency/.
Crocker, Katherine Mims. “Qualified Immunity, Sovereign Immunity, and Systemic Reform.” Duke Law Journal 71, no. 8 (2022). https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/2070.
Dayton, Kelsey Joyce. “Tangled Arms: Modernizing and Unifying the Arm-of-the-State Doctrine.” The University of Chicago Law Review 86, no. 6 (2019).
deLisle, Jacques. “Damages Remedies for Infringements of Human Rights Under U.S. Law.” American Journal of Comparative Law 62, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2013.0033.
Devins, Neal, and Louis Fisher. “Judicial Exclusivity and Political Instability.” Virginia Law Review 84, no. 1 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1073808.
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “Independence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Norms and Practices.” Constitutional Review 3, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev314.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev215.
Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Bidding Farewell to Constitutional Torts.” California Law Review 107 (2019). https://www.californialawreview.org/print/bidding-farewell-to-constitutional-torts.
Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Constitutional Remedies: In One Era and Out the Other.” Harvard Law Review 136, no. 5 (2023). https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-136/constitutional-remedies-in-one-era-and-out-the-other/.
Fallon, Richard H., Jr. “Judicial Supremacy, Departmentalism, and the Rule of Law in a Populist Age.” Texas Law Review 96, no. 3 (2018). https://texaslawreview.org/judicial-supremacy-departmentalism-rule-law-populist-age/.
Gugel, Helen. “Remaking the Mold: Pursuing Failure-to-Protect Claims under State Constitutions via Analogous Bivens Actions.” Columbia Law Review 110, no. 5 (2010). https://www.jstor.org/stable/27806651.
Hakim, M. Aunul, and Sheila Kusuma Wardani Amnesti. “Problematika Penanganan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Pemerintah (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad [unlawful acts by the government]) Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara [Problems in Handling Claims of Unlawful Acts by Government in the State Administrative Court].” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar’iah 14, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v14i1.15833.
Hantoro, Bimo Fajar. “Pembatasan Yudisial Dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Sengketa Hasil Pilkada [Judicial Limitation and Expansion of the Constitutional Court’s Authority in Deciding Regional Election Result Disputes].” Media Iuris [Legal Media] 7, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v7i1.41871.
Hirschl, Ran. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Hutchinson, Terry, and Nigel Duncan. “Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research.” Deakin Law Review 17, no. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70.
Isra, Saldi, and Pan Mohamad Faiz. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: An Overview.” In Courts and Diversity, edited by Bertus De Villiers, Saldi Isra, and Pan Mohamad Faiz. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004691698_004.
Jeffries, John C. “Damages for Constitutional Violations: The Relation of Risk to Injury in Constitutional Torts.” Virginia Law Review 75, no. 8 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/1073245.
Johnsen, Dawn E. “Functional Departmentalism and Nonjudicial Interpretation: Who Determines Constitutional Meaning?” Law and Contemporary Problems 67, no. 3 (2004). https://www.jstor.org/stable/27592054.
Kartika, Adhitya Widya. “The Existence of Decision Norms of the Constitutional Court as a Source of Legislative and Executive Laws.” Lentera Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.10495.
Kent, Andrew. “Lessons for Bivens and Qualified Immunity Debates from Nineteenth-Century Damages Litigation Against Federal Officers.” Notre Dame Law Review 96, no. 5 (2021). https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss5/1.
Lailam, Tanto, and M. Lutfi Chakim. “A Proposal to Adopt Concrete Judicial Review in Indonesian Constitutional Court: A Study on the German Federal Constitutional Court Experiences.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a1.
Lailam, Tanto, Putri Anggia, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. “The Proposal of Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1939.
Leckey, Robert. “Review of Comparative Law.” Social & Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916670718.
Lindvall, Alexander J. “Gutting Bivens: How the Supreme Court Shielded Federal Officials from Constitutional Litigation.” Missouri Law Review 85, no. 4 (2020). https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol85/iss4/7.
Margulies, Peter. “Curbing Remedies for Official Wrongs: The Need for Bivens Suits in National Security Cases.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 68, no. 4 (2018).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi [Legal Research: Revised Edition]. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Mazzuchi, Michael A. “Section 1983 and Implied Rights of Action: Rights, Remedies, and Realism.” Michigan Law Review 90, no. 5 (1992). https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol90/iss5/6.
Nelken, David. “Comparative Legal Research and Legal Culture: Facts, Approaches, and Values.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084950.
Nickerson, Alexandra, and Kellen R. Funk. “When Judges Were Enjoined: Text and Tradition in the Federal Review of State Judicial Action.” California Law Review 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15779/Z384X54H8W.
Nielson, Aaron L., and Christopher J. Walker. “Qualified Immunity and Federalism.” The Georgetown Law Journal 109, no. 2 (2020). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3544897.
Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens the Constitutional Rights.” Constitutional Review 3, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev311.
Pfander, James E., and Jacob P. Wentzel. “The Common Law Origins of Ex Parte Young.” Stanford Law Review 72 (2020).
Post, Robert, and Reva Siegel. “Popular Constitutionalism, Departmentalism, and Judicial Supremacy.” California Law Review 92, no. 4 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/3481316.
Prasetianingsih, Rahayu. “Judicial Activism in Indonesia: Constitutional Culture by the Constitutional Court.” PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah 5, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.106.
Purnamasari, Galuh Candra. “Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint) [Legal Remedies for Violations of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights through Constitutional Complaint].” Veritas et Justitia 3, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2668.
Ravenell, Teressa. “Unincorporating Qualified Immunity.” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 53, no. 2 (2022). https://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol53/iss2/5.
Reinert, Alexander A., Joanna C. Schwartz, and James E. Pfander. “New Federalism and Civil Rights Enforcement.” Northwestern University Law Review 116, no. 3 (2021). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol116/iss3/3.
Republik Indonesia [Republic of Indonesia]. Government Regulation No. 43 of 1991 on Damages and Procedures for Implementation in State Administrative Courts.
Republik Indonesia [Republic of Indonesia]. Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations, as lastly amended by Law No. 13 of 2022 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations.
Republik Indonesia [Republic of Indonesia]. Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration.
Republik Indonesia [Republic of Indonesia]. Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts, as lastly amended by Law No. 51 of 2009 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Courts.
Rossum, Samuel. “Constitutional Whodunnits: Maintaining Section 1983 and Bivens Suits Against Unidentified State Actors.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 25, no. 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.58112/jcl.25-3.3.
Roux, Theunis. “Indonesia’s Judicial Review Regime in Comparative Perspective.” Constitutional Review 4, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev422.
Schwartz, Joanna C. “Qualified Immunity and Federalism All the Way Down.” The Georgetown Law Journal 109, no. 2 (2020). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3565362.
Schwartz, Joanna C., Alexander A. Reinert, and James E. Pfander. “Going Rogue: The Supreme Court’s Newfound Hostility to Policy-Based Bivens Claims.” Notre Dame Law Review 96, no. 5 (2021). https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss5/3.
Setiawan, Andri, Antikowati Antikowati, and Bayu Dwi Anggono. “Kekuatan Mengikat Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Putusan Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Agung [The Binding Force of Constitutional Court Decisions on Judicial Review of Laws Against Supreme Court Decisions on Review of Laws and Regulations].” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 18, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i1.796.
Shattuck, Ben. “Bivens or Nothing: Constitutional Torts and Cross-Border Shootings.” Arizona State Law Journal 53 (2020). https://arizonastatelawjournal.org/2021/02/23/bivens-or-nothing-constitutional-torts-and-cross-border-shootings/.
Sisk, Gregory. “Recovering the Tort Remedy for Federal Official Wrongdoing.” Notre Dame Law Review 96, no. 5 (2021). https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss5/2.
Smith, Fred. “Local Sovereign Immunity.” Columbia Law Review 116, no. 2 (2016). https://www.jstor.org/stable/43744120.
Smith-Drelich, Noah. “The Constitutional Tort System.” Indiana Law Journal 96, no. 2 (2021). https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol96/iss2/6.
Sommermann, Karl-Peter. “Constitutional State and Public Administration.” In Public Administration in Germany, edited by Sabine Kuhlmann et al. Birmingham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_2.
Suparto, Suparto. “The Problematics Implementation of Law and Regulations Testing in Indonesia.” Yuridika 37, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.28627.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Circular No. 2 of 2019 on the Implementation of the Results of the 2019 Supreme Court Chamber Plenary Meeting as Guidelines for the Performance of Court Duties.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2019 on Guidelines for the Settlement of Government Action Disputes and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies and/or Officials (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad [unlawful acts by the government]).
Susilo, Agus Budi. “Reformulasi Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Badan Atau Pejabat Pemerintahan Dalam Konteks Kompetensi Absolut Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara [Reformulation of Unlawful Acts by Government Agencies or Officials in the Context of the Absolute Competence of the State Administrative Court].” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 2, no. 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.291-308.
Taekema, Sanne. “Theoretical and Normative Frameworks for Legal Research: Putting Theory into Practice.” Law and Method 2018, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000031.
Vladeck, Stephen I. “The Disingenuous Demise and Death of Bivens.” Cato Supreme Court Review (2019).
Wadi, Raines, et al. “Tindakan Faktual Hasil Putusan Etik DKPP Sebagai Objek Pengujian Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara [Factual Acts Resulting from DKPP Ethics Decisions as Objects of Review in the State Administrative Court].” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure [De Jure Journal of Legal Research] 23, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.071-086.
Warjiyati, Sri, et al. “Complaint Authority for Constitutional Complaint by Indonesia’s Constitutional Court.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 10, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i2.1070.
Weber, Ruth. “Law-Making Activity of the German Federal Constitutional Court.” In Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts, edited by Monika Florczak-Wątor. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022442-2.
Wells, Michael L., William P. Marshall, and Gene R. Nichol. Cases and Materials on Federal Courts. 4th ed. St. Paul: West Academic Publishing, 2020.
West, E. Garrett. “Refining Constitutional Torts.” The Yale Law Journal 134 (2025). https://www.yalelawjournal.org/feature/refining-constitutional-torts.
West, E. Garrett. “Torts Stories After Bivens.” Harvard Law Review Forum 138 (2025).
Wico, Standy, et al. “Constitutional Complaint in Indonesia Through the Lens of Legal Certainty.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Society 2, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v2i1.21449.
Woolhandler, Ann, and Michael G. Collins. “Was Bivens Necessary?” Notre Dame Law Review 96, no. 5 (2021). https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol96/iss5/5.
