Conscientious Objection Before the Indonesian Constitutional Court

Heribertus Jaka Triyana

Abstract


The issuance of Indonesia’s Law No. 23 of 2019 on the Management of National Resources for State Defense (PSDN Law) sparked a national debate on conscription and conscientious objection. Consequently, a coalition of civic society organizations submitted the PSDN Law before the Constitutional Court for judicial review. They argued that the PSDN Law violates the Indonesian Constitution’s Article 28 on human rights protection. One of the legal submissions is based on the argument that the PSDN Law deliberately ignores human rights in order to provide reserve and backup components to the military. This argument is supported by Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the ICCPR’s General Comment No. 22 of 1993 paragraph 11, justifying conscientious objection as an inherent human right. The analysis in this paper is mainly uses the legal positivism paradigm and the human rights-based approach. This paradigm provides a framework for analyzing how the PSDN Law generates a distinctive legal feature for Indonesia’s legal system. In line with Article 28 of the Indonesian Constitution, the Constitutional Court should explicitly assess the preservation of civil rights. It may be claimed that conceivable legal gaps (norm versus reality) and legal loopholes add to the Constitutional Court’s obligation to consider the omission of conscientious objection recognition. This article argues the Constitutional Court should adjudicate on the issue of citizens being conscripted as reserve and backup components in situations of military threats, hybrid threats and/or non-military threats. This research further maintains that the Constitutional Court should recognize the existence of conscientious objection as an inherent human right, as a form of judicial activism. In accordance with the doctrine of judicial activism, the Court could resolve and offer solutions to the existence of conscientious objection as a democratic civil right. The Court should also determine the area, scope, application and orientation of conscientious objection as a distinct feature of human rights based on Indonesia’s context and perspective on defense required by international human rights treaties, conventions, or general comments on such instruments.

Keywords


Conscientious Objection; Conscription; Human Rights Abuses; Military Service

Full Text:

PDF

References


Constitution of Indonesia.

Aldrich, George H. “Compliance with International Humanitarian Law.”

International Review of the Red Cross, no. 282 (1991).

Amrallah, Borhan. “The International Responsibility of the United Nations for Activities Carried Out by UN Peace-Keeping Forces.” Revue Egyptienne de Droit Internationalle 57 (1976).

Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. “Demokrasi, Keamanan dan Peranan Militer [Democracy, Security and the Role of the Military].” In Ikrar Nusa Bakti, Dinamika Internal Tentang Peran dan Fungsi TNI [Nusa Bakti Pledge, Internal Dynamics of the Role and Functions of the TNI], edited by Ikrar Nusa Bhakti, 19-21. Jakarta: LIPI Political Research Center, 2001.

ASEAN Secretariat. ASEAN ICT Masterplan. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2020. Avonius, Leena and Damien Kingsbury. Human Rights in Asia: A Reassessment

of the Asian Values Debate. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

Boessan, Jakob Kirkemann and Thomas Martin. Applying a Rights-Based Approach: An Inspirational Guide for Civil Society. Denmark: The Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2007.

BPIP and University of Bangka Belitung. “Kajian Evaluasi Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara [An Evaluation Study of Law No. 23 of 2019 on the Management of National Resources for State Defense].” Final Report, BPIP and University of Bangka Belitung, 2019.

Budiardjo, Miriam. Demokrasi di Indonesia: Demokrasi Parlementer dan Demokrasi Pancasila [Democracy in Indonesia: Parliamentary Democracy and Pancasila Democracy]. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1994.

Burgstaller, Markus. Theories of Compliance with International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.

Cerone, John. “Minding the Gap: Outlining KFOR Accountability in Post-Conflict in Kosovo.” European Journal of International Law 12, no. 3 (2001).

Conforti, Benedetto. Enforcing International Human Rights in Domestic Courts. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997.

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. “Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, No. 27/PUU-XIX/2021 [Review of Law Number 23 of 2019 on the Management of National Resources for State Defense Against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, No. 27/PUU-XIX/2021].” Report, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, 2021.

Daoust, Isabella, Robin Coupland, and Rikke Ishoey. “New Wars, New Weapons? The Obligation of States to Assess the Legality of Means and Methods of Warfare.” International Review of the Red Cross 84, no. 846 (2002).

Doherty, Katherine and McCormack, Timothy L.H. “‘Complementarity’ as a Catalyst for Comprehensive Domestic Penal Legislation.” University of California Davis Journal of International Law and Policy 5 (1995).

Elias, T.O. New Horizons in International Law. 2nd ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1979.

Eldridge, Philip J. The Politics of Human Rights in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, 2002.

European Court of Human Rights. Case of Loizidou vs. Turkey, Preliminary Objections, No. 15318/89 (European Court of Human Rights March 23, 1995).

Federasi KontraS. “Desakan Penyelesaian Kasus Alas Tlogo [Urge for the Settlement of the Tlogo Pedestal Case].” KontraS, published August 02, 2008. https:// kontras.or.id/kontras-surabaya/desakan-penyelesaian-kasus-alas-tlogo.

Fiske, Alan Page. “Complementarity Theory: Why Human Social Capacity Evolved to Require Cultural Complement.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, no. 1 (2000).

Fisher, D. “Domestic Regulation of International Humanitarian Relief in Disasters and Armed Conflict: A Comparative Analysis.” International Review of the Red Cross, no. 866 (2007).

Gates, Bill. How to Avoid Climate Disaster. New York: Penguin, 2021.

Gearoid Tuathail et al. The Geopolitics Reader. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Graditzky, Thomas. “Individual Criminal Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law in Internal Armed Conflicts.” International Review of the Red Cross 38, no. 322 (1998).

Guzman, Andrew. How International Law Works, A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Heintze, Hans-Joachim. Convergence Between Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law and the Consequences for the Implementation. London: Springer, 2011.

Helm, Deiter. Net Zero: How We Stop Causing Climate Change. United Kingdom: HarperCollins, 2022.

Hofmann, Michael H. “Peace-Enforcement Actions and Humanitarian Law: Emerging Rules for Interventional Armed Conflict.” International Review of the Red Cross 82, no. 837 (2000).

Holmes, John T. “The Principle of Complementarity.” In The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute – Issues, Negotiations, Results. Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999.

Human Rights Committee. “Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant, Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee.” Report, No. CCPR/C/79/Add.61 (1993).

Human Rights Committee. L.T.K. vs. Finland, No. Communication 185/1984, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 pp. 61 (n.d.).

Human Rights Committee. “Human Rights Committee.” Report, No. U.N. GAOR, 62nd Sess., Supp. No. 40, U.N. Doc. A/62/40, Vol. II, Annex VII, sect. V, pp. 195 (2007).

Human Rights Committee. “Selected Decisions of the Human Rights Committee under the Optional Protocol.” Report, Vol. IX, pp. 218, No. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/ OP/9, U.N. Sales No. E.08.XIV.9 (2008).

Human Rights Committee. Yoon and Choi vs. Republic of Korea, No. Comm. 1321-1322/2004, U.N. Doc. A/62/40, Vol. II pp. 195 (2006).

J., Christian. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996.

Jayawickrama, Nihal. The Judicial Application of Human Rights National, Regional and International Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Joinet, Louis. “Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Human Rights Violations (Civil and Political).” Report (published). Sub-Commission Decision 1996/119, 1996.

Joseph, Sarah, Jenny Schultz, and Melissa Castan. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Kelsall, Michelle Staggs. The New ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights: Toothless Tiger or Tentative First Step? United States: East- West Center, 2009.

Kleffner, Jann K. “The Impact of Complementarity on National Implementation of Substantive International Criminal Law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 1, no. 1 (2003).

Koh, Tommy and Rosario G Manalo. The Making of the ASEAN Charter. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2009.

Korner. “Deductive Unification and Idealization.” The British Society for Philosophy of Science 63, no. 20 (1964).

Kritz, Neil. “Coming to Terms with Atrocities: A Review of Accountability Mechanism for Mass Violations of Human Rights.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59, no. 4 (1996).

Krygier, Martin. “Critical Legal Studies and Social Theory.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7, no. 5 (1987).

Lawson, Rick. “Out of Control, State Responsibility and Human Rights: Will the ILC’s Definitions of the Act of State Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century.” In The Role of Nations State in the 21st Century, Human Rights, International Organizations and Foreign Policies, Essay in Honor of Peter Baehr, edited by Monique Castermans-Holleman, Fried van Hoof, and Jacqueline Smith, Cambridge: Kluwer Law International, 1999.

Margolis, Eric and Stephen Laurence. “Concepts and Cognitive Science.” In Margolis and S. Laurence. Stanford: Stanford University, 1996.

Marwiyah, Siti. “Kewenangan Konstitusional Presiden Terhadap Hal Ikhwal Kegentingan yang Memaksa [The President’s Constitutional Authority on Emergency Matters].” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum 3, no. 44 (2015).

Matompo, Osgar S. “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Prespektif Keadaan Darurat [The Restrictions on Human Rights in the Perspective of Emergencies].” Jurnal Media Hukum 21, no. 57 (2014).

Mauna, Boer. Hukum Internasional, Pengertian Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global [International Law, Understanding the Role and Function in the Era of Global Dynamics]. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2003.

McCormack, Timothy L.H. “From Solferino to Sarajevo: A Continuing Role for International Humanitarian Law.” Melbourne University Law Review 21 (1997).

Media Indonesia. “Pengujian UU PSDN, TNI/POLRI Komponen Utama Pertahanan Keamanan [Judicial Review the PSDN Law, TNI/POLRI Main Components of Defense and Security].” Media Indonesia, published 21 October 2021. https:// mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/442853/pengujian-uu-psdn-tnipolri- komponen-utama-pertahanan-dan-keamanan.

Miller, Benjamin. “The Concept of Security: Should it be Redefined?” Journal of Strategic Studies 24, no. 2 (2001).

Minear, Larry. “Conscience and Carnage in Afghanistan and Iraq: US Veterans Ponder the Experience.” Journal of Military Ethics 13, no. 2 (2014).

Muradi. Metamorfosis Bisnis Militer: Sebaran Bisnis TNI Pasca UU TNI Diterbitkan [The Metamorphosis of Military Business: Distribution of TNI Business After Issuing the TNI Law]. Jakarta: The RIDEP Institute, 2007.

National Commission on Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. “Menyoal Undang-Undang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara (PSDN) [Questioning the Law on the Management of National Resources for State Defense (PSDN)].” Komnas HAM Republik Indonesia, published 23 March 2020. https://www.komnasham.go.id/index.php/ news/2020/3/23/1338/menyoal-undang-undang-pengelolaan-sumber-daya- nasional-untuk-pertahanan-negara-psdn.html.

Nurhasim, Moch. Praktek-Praktek Bisnis Militer: Pengalaman Indonesia, Burma, Filipina, dan Korea Selatan [Military Business Practices: Experiences of Indonesia, Burma, Philippines, and South Korea]. Jakarta: The RIDEP Institute, 2003.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Security Sector Reforms and Governance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2005.

Pattissina, Edna C. “Amandemen Penundaan UU PSDN Diperkuat [Amendment to Postponement of PSDN Law Strengthened].” Kompas, published August 05, 2021. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2021/08/05/argumen-penundaan- uu-psdn-diperkuat/.

Prasad, D. and T. Smythe. Conscription: A World Survey – Compulsory Military Service and Resistance to It. London: War Resisters’ International, 1968.

Putra, Nanda Perdana. “Pro Kontra Rekruitmen Komponen Cadangan, UU PSDN Digugat ke MK [Pros and Cons of Reserve Component Recruitment, PSDN Law Sued to Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia].” Merdeka, published 31 May 2021. https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/pro-kontra- rekrutmen-komponen-cadangan-uu-psdn-digugat-ke-mk.html.

Raharjo, Satjipto. Biarkan Hukum Mengalir, Catatan Kritis Tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum [Let the Law Flow, A Critical Note on the Struggle of Man and Law]. Jakarta: Kompas, 2000.

Ramadhan, Bilal. “Pengamat: Penerapan UU PSDN Bisa Berdampak Negatif [Observer: The Implementation of the PSDN Law Can Have a Negative Impact].” Republika, published June 02, 2022. https://www.republika.co.id/ berita/rcuptz330/pengamat-penerapan-uu-psdn-bisa-berdampak-negatif.

Rand, Jude and Watson. Rights-Based Approaches: Learning Project. Boston: Oxfam America and Care, 2007.

Ratner, Steven and Jason Abrams. Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Rieter, Eva and Zwaan, Karina. Urgency and Human Rights, The Protective Potential and Legitimacy of Interim Measures. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2020.

Rieter, Eva. Preventing Irreparable Harm: Provisional Measures in International Human Rights Adjudication. Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010.

Roberts, Adam. “Humanitarian Issues and Agencies as Triggers for International Military Action.” International Review of the Red Cross 82, no. 839 (2000).

Robertson, Robert E. “Measuring State Compliance with the Obligation to Devote the “Maximum Available Resources” to Realizing Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994).

Ruqoyoh, Siti. “Ada 17 Pasal UU PSDN yang Bermasalah [There are 17 problematic articles of the PSDN Law].” Viva, published June 17, 2022. https://www.viva. co.id/berita/nasional/1486277-ada-13-pasal-nbsp-di-uu-psdn-yang-dianggap- bermasalah.

Sadewo, Joko. “Ketua PBHI Sebut UU PSDN Banyak Masalah Substansial [PBHI Chairman Calls PSDN Law Many Substantial Problems].” Republika, published June 17, 2022. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/rdkxu7318/ketua-pbhi-sebut- uu-psdn-untuk-pertahanan-banyak-masalah-substansial.

Saputra, Andi. “Hikmahanto Juwana di MK: UU PSDN Adalah UU yang Disiapkan Bila Ada Perang [Hikmahanto Juwana at the Constitutional Court: The PSDN Law is a Law Prepared for the Event of War].” DetikNews, published February

, 2022. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5935786/hikmahanto-juwana-di- mk-uu-psdn-adalah-uu-yang-disiapkan-bila-ada-perang.

Saputra, Dede Anggara. “Analisis Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara [Political Analysis of Law No. 23 of 2019 on the Management of National Resources for State Defense].” Lex Renaissance 5, no. 4 (2020).

Sassòli, Marco and Antoine Bouvier. “How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents and Teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law.” ICRC, published 9 June 2020. http:// https://www.icrc. org/en/publication/0739-how-does-law-protect-war-cases-documents-and- teaching-materials-contemporary.

SETARA Institute. “Pemerintah Bergerak Cepat Membuat Aturan Turunan UU PSDN, Tapi Lamban Merespon Sorotan [The Government Moves Quickly to Create Derivative Regulations for the PSDN Law, but is Slow to Respond to Highlights].” SETARA Institute, published January 22, 2021. https://setara- institute.org/pemerintah-bergerak-cepat-dalam-membuat-aturan-turunan- uu-psdn-tetapi-lamban-merespons-sorotan/.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia [Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia]. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Sibarani, Shanty. Antara Kekeuasaan dan Profesionalisme Menuju Kemandirian Polri [Between Power and Professionalism Towards Police Independence]. Jakarta: PT Dhramapena, 2001.

Steiner, Henry J. and Phillip Alston. International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals: Text and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Stigen, Jo. The Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and National Jurisdictions, The Principle of Complementarity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.

Summers, Robert S. Form and Function in A Legal System A General Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Swedish National Defence College. Challenges of Peace Operations: Into the 21st Century. Sweden: Elanders Gotab, 2002.

Tanner, Fred. “Conflict Prevention and Conflict Resolution: The Limits to Multilateralism.” International Review of the Red Cross 83, no. 541 (2000).

Teson, Fermanon. Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996.

The Asia Pacific Center. The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia. California: The Asia Pacific Center, 2009.

The Indonesian Human Rights Monitor. Menggugat Komponen Cadangan [Claiming Reserve Components]. Jakarta: Imparsial, 2022.

Thio, Li-an. “Implementing Human Rights in ASEAN Countries: Promises to Keep Miles to Go Before I Sleep.” Yale Human Rights and Development Journal 2, no. 1 (2014).

Tobin, John. “Seeking Clarity in Relation to the Principle of Complementarity: Reflection on The Recent Contributions of Some International Bodies.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 8 (2007).

Torre, Massimo La. Law and Institutions. London: Springer, 2009.

Triyana, Heribertus Jaka. “Pengaruh Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Berat Hukum Humaniter Internasional [The Effect of Article 4 of Law No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights on Law Enforcement Efforts for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law].” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 1, no. 3 (2004).

Turk, Daniel. “The Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Report (published). United Nations Economic and Social Council, 1989.

Turk, Daniel. “The Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Report (published). United Nations Economic and Social Council, 1990.

Turk, Daniel. “The Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Report (published). United Nations Economic and Social Council, 1991.

Turk, Daniel. “The Realization of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Report (published). United Nations Economic and Social Council, 1992.

UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. “Approaches and Challenges with Regard to Application Procedures for Obtaining the Status of Conscientious Objector to Military Service in Accordance with Human Rights Standards.” Report (published). United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2019.

UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. “Commission on Human Rights, Resolution 1998/77 on Conscientious Objection to Military Service.” Report, No. E/CN/4/RES/1998/77 (1998).

UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. “General Comments 22: The Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion.” Report, No. CCPR/21/Rev.1/Add.4 (1993).

UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. “Selected Decisions of the Human Rights Committee under the Optional Protocol.” Report, Vol. III, pp. 262, No. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/3, U.N. Sales No. E.02.XIV.1 (2002).

United Nations Development Programme. “Public Accountability of Democratic Institution.” Report (published). 2002.

United Nations Human Rights Committee. “Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, General Comment 3.” Report, No. HR1/GEN/1/Rev.1 (1981).

United Nations Human Rights Committee. Jarvinen vs. Fin, No. Comm. 295/1988, U.N. Doc. A/45/40, Vol. II, pp. 101.

United Nations Human Rights Committee. J.P.K. vs. The Netherlands, No. CCPR/C/43/D/401/1990, CCPR/C/43/D/401/1990, (November 18, 1991).

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. “Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials.” Report, No. 34/169 (1979).

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Conscientious Objection to Military Service. Geneva and Switzerland: United Nations Publication, 2012.

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Frequently Asked Questions on a Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation. New York and Geneva: United Nations Publication, 2006.

United Nations Secretary General. “Secretary-General’s Bulletin: Observance by United Nations Forces of International Humanitarian Law.” Report, No. ST/ SGB/1999/13 (1999).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/758, No. S/Res/758 (1992).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/761, No. S/Res/761 (1992).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/770, No. S/Res/770 (1992).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/814, No. S/Res/814 (1993).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/918, No. S/Res/918 (1994).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/975, No. S/Res/975 (1995).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/1101, No. S/Res/1101 (1997).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/1199, No. S/Res/1199 (1998).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/1270, No. S/Res/1270 (1999).

United Nations Security Council. S/Res/1272, No. S/Res/1272 (1999).

Widjajanto, Andi. Reformasi Sektor Keamanan Indonesia [Indonesia’s Security

Sector Reform]. Jakarta: Pro Patria, 2004.

Yergin, Daniel. The New Map, Energy, Climate and the Clash of the Nations.

New York: Penguin, 2020.

Yoder, Anne M. Conscientious Objection in America: Primary Sources for Research. Pennsylvania: Swarthmore College Peace Collection, 2003.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev825

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 121 times
PDF view : 29 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Constitutional Review