Rethinking Constitutional Interpretation through Joseph Raz’s Analytical Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1118Keywords:
Analytical Jurisprudence, Authority, Constitutional Interpretation, Joseph Raz, Rational and Moral JustificationAbstract
Joseph Raz’s analytical jurisprudence serves as a philosophical foundation for rethinking constitutional interpretation, particularly in the context of Indonesian legal discourse. Raz provides a rich theoretical framework that emphasizes the relationship between legal authority, moral legitimacy, and rational justification. He challenges the notion that legal authority is simply the power to command, arguing instead that it must be grounded in its ability to offer reasons that individuals have a good reason to follow reasons that are both morally and rationally justified. This perspective is especially important in constitutional adjudication, where courts are tasked with interpreting foundational legal texts in a way that balances fidelity to legal language with responsiveness to societal change. Raz maintains that legal texts cannot be understood in isolation rather, their meaning is shaped by the intentions of their drafters, the purposes they serve, and the broader cultural and historical context. His dialogical approach to interpretation urges judges to engage with law not just as static rules but as evolving instruments of justice. Methodologically, this research employs a philosophical and jurisprudential approach. The study proceeds by collecting and categorizing literature relevant to both the formal and material objects of the research. The formal object includes Raz’s core writings on legal and constitutional interpretation, as well as foundational works by other scholars who shaped his thought. The material object focuses on interpretive frameworks, constitutional reasoning, and the role of legal authority in discovering and reflecting constitutional interpretation. This method enables a critical examination of how Raz’s interpretive framework applies to Indonesia’s constitutional challenges, such as the tension between legal certainty and moral responsiveness. The study argues that Raz’s ideas offer a compelling alternative to rigid textualism by encouraging an approach that is normatively coherent, ethically responsible, and socially aware.
References
Abouharb, M. Rodwan, Laura P. Moyer, and Megan Schmidt. “De Facto Judicial Independence and Physical Integrity Rights.” Journal of Human Rights 12, no. 4 (October 2013): 367–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2013.812461.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. “Universalization of Democratic Constitutionalism and the Work of Constitutional Courts Today.” Constitutional Review 1, no. 2 (December 2015): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev121
Banović, Damir. “About John Austin’s Analytical Jurisprudence: The Empirical Rationalist Legal Positivism.” International Comparative Law Review 21, no. 1 (2021): 241–261. https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2021-0010.
Barak, Aharon. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
Bix, Brian. “Raz, Authority, and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 51 (December 2006): 311. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/449.
Bogucki, K. “Truth in Judicial Fact-Finding and Legal Interpretation.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 36, no. 2 (April 2023): 649–663.
Bustamante, Thomas, and Thiago Lopes Decat, eds. Philosophy of Law as an Integral Part of Philosophy: Essays on the Jurisprudence of Gerald J. Postema. London: Bloomsbury, 2020.
Craig, Edward. Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2000.
Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
Ducat, Craig R. Constitutional Interpretation. 9th ed. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2008.
Endicott, Timothy. Administrative Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Freeman, Michael. Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2014.
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.
Gardner, John. Law as a Leap of Faith: Essays on Law in General. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Haugaard, M. “What Is Authority?” Journal of Classical Sociology 18, no. 2 (June 2018): 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17723737.
Kurek, Łukasz. “Antinaturalism in the Legal Philosophy of Joseph Raz.” Polish Law Review 3, no. 1 (2017): 201–214. https://www.polishlawreview.pl.
Luciano, Venezia. “Raz’s Normative Theory of Authority.” Philosophical Enquiries: Revue des Philosophies Anglophones, no. 1 (June 2013): 95–110. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00865385v1.
Manullang, E. Fernando M. “Penafsiran Teleologis/Sosiologis, Penafsiran Purposive dan Aharon Barak: Suatu Refleksi Kritis [Teleological/Sociological Interpretation, Purposive Interpretation and Aharon Barak: A Critical Reflection].” VeJ 5, no. 2 (June 2019): 262–285. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v5i2.3495.
Manullang, E. Fernando M. Norma Hanyalah Makna Grundnorm Malah Seperti Tuhan [Norm Is Only the Means, the Grundnorm Is Like God]. Yogyakarta: Nasmedia Publishing, 2024.
Marmor, Andrei. Philosophy of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
Martin, B. “Raz’s Appeal to Law’s Authority.” Philosophical Studies 181 (January 2024): 267–280. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-023-02085-4.
Martin, Margaret. “Raz’s The Morality of Freedom: Two Models of Authority.” Jurisprudence 1 (June 2010): 63–84. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033210791557272.
Meyer, Lukas H., Stanley L. Paulson, and Thomas W. Pogge, eds. Rights, Culture, and the Law: Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Mutaqin, Zezen Zaenal. “The Strong State and Pancasila: Reflecting Human Rights in the Indonesian Democracy.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (December 2016): 159–188. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev221.
Plunkett, David, and Scott Shapiro. “Law, Morality, and Everything Else: General Jurisprudence as a Branch of Meta-Normative Inquiry.” Ethics 127, no. 1 (October 2017): 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1086/692941.
Rasjidi, Lili, and B. Arief Sidharta. Filsafat Hukum Mazhab dan Refleksinya [The School of Legal Philosophy and Its Reflections]. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 1989.
Raz, Joseph. “Authority and Consent.” Virginia Law Review 67, no. 1 (February 1981): 103–131. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1072835.
Raz, Joseph. “A Matter Principle by Ronald Dworkin.” California Law Review 74, no. 3 (May 1986): 1103–1119. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3480404.
Raz, Joseph. “Authority, Law and Morality.” Monist 68, no. 3 (July 1985): 295–324.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27902922.
Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” Scholarship Archive, Columbia Law School (1972): 823–854.
Raz, Joseph. “Legal Validity.” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 63, no. 3 (1977): 339–353. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23679040.
Raz, Joseph. “Morality as Interpretation.” Scholarship Archive, Columbia Law School (1991): 392–405. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_ scholarship/2232.
Raz, Joseph. Practical Reason and Norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. 1st ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Raz, Joseph. Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Raz, Joseph. Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994
Raz, Joseph. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” Scholarship Archive, Columbia Law School (April 1972): 823–854.
Raz, Joseph. “Normativity.” Philosophical Issues 25 (October 2015): 144–164.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26611125.
Raz, Joseph. “On Lawful Governments.” Scholarship Archive, Columbia Law
School (July 1970): 296–303. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2233.
Raz, Joseph. “On Respect, Authority, and Neutrality: A Response.” Ethics 120, no. 2 (January 2010): 279–301. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/651426.
Raz, Joseph. “On the Nature of Law.” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 82, no. 1 (1996): 1–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23680735.
Raz, Joseph. “Permissions and Supererogation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 12, no. 2 (April 1975): 161–168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009570.
Raz, Joseph. “Principle of Equality.” Mind 87, no. 3 (July 1978): 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXXVII.3.321.
Raz, Joseph. “Promises in Morality and Law.” Scholarship Archive, Columbia Law School (1982): 916–938. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/759.
Raz, Joseph. “The Institutional Nature of Law.” Modern Law Review 38, no. 5 (September 1975): 489–503. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1093828.
Raz, Joseph, and James Griffin. “Mixing Values.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 65 (1991): 83–118. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4106772.
Regan, Donald H. “Reasons, Authority, and the Meaning of Obey: Further Thoughts on Raz and Obedience to Law.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 3 (1990): 3–28. https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/341.
Rugian, Irene Angelita. “Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 2 (June 2021): 461–479. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1829.
Scheffler, Samuel. “Choice, Circumstance, and the Value of Equality.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4, no. 1 (January 2005): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05049434.
Sheehy, Benedict. “Law, Language, and the Social Construction of Legal Reality.” International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse (December 2023).
https://doi.org/10.56498/1122023616.
Skinner, Stephen. “Stories of Pain and the Pursuit of Justice: Law, Violence, Experience and Jurisprudence.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 5, no. 1 (2009): 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872108096866.
Sidharta, B. Arief. Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fundasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia [Reflection on the Structure of Legal Science: A Study of the Philosophical Foundations and Scientific Nature of Legal Science as the Basis for Developing National Legal Science in Indonesia]. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, 2009.
Silalahi, Artha Debora. “Paradoks Ide Negara Hukum dalam Justifikasi Filosofis Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum [The Paradox of the Rule-of-Law Idea in the Philosophical Justification of Pancasila as the Source of Law].” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 1 (March 2024): 62–76. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2114.
Silalahi, Artha Debora. “Some Debates of Hermeneutic and Legal Interpretation: Critical Analysis of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics.” Jurnal Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 36, no. 1 (June 2024): 213–233.
https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v36i1.9493.
Silalahi, Artha Debora. “The Framework of Law Impacts in Philosophy of Law and Justice: How Is the Certainty of Law and Justice Understood?” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Nusantara Philosophy (ICNP 2022) (2022). https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.409434.
Silalahi, Artha Debora, et al. “Axiological Insights into Unveiling Independent Constitutional Judge Decisionism.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 3 (September 2024): 230–245. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i3.85127.
Silalahi, Artha Debora, et al. “Navigating the Democratic Crisis: Indonesia’s Journey through Political Ethics, Law, and Social Change.” Jurnal Sapientia Humana 4, no. 2 (2024): 221–232. https://doi.org/10.26593/jsh.v4i02.8547.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Tarski, Alfred. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, no. 3 (March 1944): 341–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102968.
Tommasini, Nicola. “Judicial Self-Empowerment and Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 22, no. 1 (January 2024): 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae009.
Twining, William. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Wacks, Raymond. Understanding Jurisprudence: An Introduction to Legal Theory. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
