The Turkish Constitutional Court During the State of Emergency Between 2016 and 2018

Engin Yıldırım

doi:10.31078/consrev921

The Turkish Constitutional Court During the State of Emergency Between 2016 and 2018

Engin Yıldırım

Abstract

This article investigates the judicial approach of the Turkish Constitutional Court (TCC) during the period of state of emergency between 2016 and 2018 in Türkiye. Like its counterparts facing similar challenges, the TCC has endeavored to strike a balance between defeating grave threats to the constitutional system and defending fundamental rights in a time of public emergency. While constitutional courts should try to protect constitutional rights from executive abuse of emergency powers, they should do so without jeopardizing the effectiveness of these measures in countering threats to the nation. During the period of state of emergency, the TCC adopted a deferential stance in its constitutionality review cases arising from its textualist interpretation of the constitution, which explicitly prohibits the review of emergency decrees. However, the Court embraced a posture of rights protection in its individual applications procedure, which requires the TCC to follow case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

Keywords

Constitutionality Review; Individual Application; State of Emergency; Turkish Constitutional Court

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bali, Asli. “Courts and Constitutional Transitions: Lessons from the Turkish Case.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no.3 (2013): 666-701. doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot025.

Belge, Ceren. “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey.” Law and Society Review 40, no. 3 (2006):653-692. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00276.x.

“Bireysel Başvuru İstatistikleri [Individual Applications Statistics]: Accessed on 25 March 2022. https://www.anayasa.gov.tr/media/7946/bb_2022-1_tr.pdf. (23/9/2012- 31/3/2022/1).

Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo. “The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe.” European Constitutional Law Review 15, no. 1 (2019):48-72. doi.org/10.1017/ S1574019619000026.

Cole, David. “The Poverty of Posner’s Pragmatism: Balancing Away Liberty After 9/11.” Stanford Law Review 59, no. 6 (2007): 1735-1751.

Cole, David. “Judging the Next Emergency: Judicial Review and Individual Rights in Times of Crisis.” Michigan Law Review 101, no. 8 (2003): 2565- 2695. doi:10.2307/3595389.

Constitution of the Republic of Turkiye, Article 119, Law No 2709 of 1982. Accessed 7 August 2022. https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf.

Constitution of the Republic of Turkiye, Article 15, Law No 2709 of 1982. Accessed 7 August 2022. https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf.

Constitution of the Republic of Turkiye, Article 148, Law No 2709 of 1982, accessed 7 August 2022. https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf.

Constitution of the Republic of Turkiye, Article 90, Law No 2709 of 1982. Accessed 7 August 2022. https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Sahin Alpay v. Turkey, App. No 16538/17, 20 March 2018.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Mehmet Hasan Altan v. Turkey, App. no. 13237/17, 20 March 2018.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Çatal v. Turkey, ECtHR, App. No. 2873/17, 07 March 2017.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Mercan v. Turkey, App. No. 56511/16, 17 November 2016.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Zihni v. Turkey, App. No. 59061/16, 08 December 2016.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, A and others v. the United Kingdom, App. no. 3455/05, 19 February 2009.

Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Lawless v. Ireland (3), App. no. 332/57, 01 July1961.

Decree No 667. Accessed on 12 August 2022. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2016/07/20160723-8.htm.

Decree No 672. Accessed on 12 August 2022. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/ eskiler/2016/09/20160901M1-1.htm.

Göztepe, Ece. “The Permanency of the State of Emergency in Turkey: The Rise of a Constituent Power or Only a New Quality of the State?” Z Politikwiss 28, no. 4 (2018): 521-534. doi.org/10.1007/s41358-018-0161-0.

Gross, Oren. “Constitutions and Emergency Regimes.” In Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Tom Ginsburg and Rosalind Dixon, 334-355. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011. doi.org/10.4337/9780857931214.00027.

Gross, Oren. “Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always Be Constitutional?” Yale Law Journal 112, no. 6, (2003): 1011-1134. doi. 10.2139/ ssrn.370800.

Gross, Oren. “Once More unto the Breach: The Systemic Failure of Applying the European Convention on Human Rights to Entrenched Emergencies.” The Yale Journal of International Law 23 (1998): 437-501. http://hdl.handle. net/20.500.13051/6386.

Hazama, Yasushi. “Hegemonic Preservation or Horizontal Accountability.” International Political Science Review 33, no. 4 (2012): 421-440. doi. org/10.1177/0192512111414132.

Individual Application to the Constitutional Court of Türkiye, Erdal Tercan, B. No. 2016/15637 (Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, 12 April 2018).

Individual Application to the Constitutional Court of Türkiye, Aydın Yavuz and others. B. No. 2016/22169 (Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, 20 June 2017).

Individual Application to the Constitutional Court of Türkiye, Hacı Osman Kaya, B. No. 2016/41934 (Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, 16 February 2017).

Individual Application to Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, Erdem Gül and Can Dündar, B. No: 2015/15867 (Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, 25 February 2016).

Individual Application to Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, YouTube LLC Corporation Service Company and Others, B. No. 2014/4705 (Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkiye, 29 May 2014).

Jonsson Cornell, Anna and Janne Salminen. “Emergency Laws in Comparative Constitutional Law – The Case of Sweden and Finland.” German Law Journal, 19, no.2 (2018): 219-249. doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200022677.

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court, E. 2016/166, K. 2016/159 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye, 12 October 2016).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court, Decision of Constitutional Court, E.2018/74, K.2019/92 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye 24 December 2019).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court, Decision of Constitutional Court E.2018/90, K.2019/85 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye 14 November 2019).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court, E.2016/205, K.2019/63 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye, 24 July 2019).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court E.2018/73, K.2019/65 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye 24 July 2019).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court E.2003/28, K.2003/42 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye 22 May 2003).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court E. 1990/25, K. 1991/1 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye 10 January 1991).

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court, E. 1991/6, K. 1991/20 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Türkiye 10 January 1991).

Köker, Levent. “Turkey’s Political-Constitutional Crisis: An Assessment of the Role of the Constitutional Court.” Constellations 17, no. 2 (2010): 328-344. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00594.x.

Mariniello, Triestino. “Prolonged Emergency and Derogation of Human Rights: Why the European Court Should Raise Its Immunity System.” German Law Journal 20, no.1 (2019): 46-71. doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.3.

Özbudun, Ergun. “Political Origins of the Turkish Constitutional Court and the Problem of Democratic Legitimacy.” European Public Law 12, no.2 (2006): 213-223. doi.org/10.54648/euro2006014.

Posner, Richard. Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Russell A. Miller. “Balancing security and Liberty in Germany.” Journal of National Security Law and Policy 4 (2010): 369-396.

“The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.” Opened for signature 4 November 1950, Article 15. https://www.echr.coe.int/ documents/convention_eng.pdf.

Tushnet, Mark. “Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime.” Wisconsin Law Review 2003, no.2 (2003): 273307. dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.368323.

Uitz, Renata. “Courts and the Expansion of Executive Power: Making the Constitution Matter.” In The Evolution of the Separation of Powers: Between the Global North and the Global South, edited by David Bilchitz and David Landau, 85-113. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018. doi.org/10.4337/978178536 9773.00010.

Vauchez, Stephanie Hennette. “The State of Emergency in France: Days without End.” European Constitutional Law Review 14, no. 4 (2018): 700-720. doi. org/10.1017/S1574019618000391.

Yoo, John C. “Judicial Review and the War on Terrorism.” George Washington Law Review 72 (2003): 427-451. dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.461721.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev921