The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, Raymond. “Perlukah Dissenting Opinion Di Mahkamah Agung?” Pemantau
Peradilan, April 7, 2003. http://www.pemantauperadilan.com/detil/detil.
php?id=68&tipe=opini.
Beudenbacher, Carl. “Some Remarks on the Method of Civil Law.” Texas
International Law Journal 34 (1999): 333.
Blankenburg, Erhard. Dutch Legal Culture. 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Boston: Kluwer
Law and Taxation Publishers, 1994.
Blomquist, RF. “Dissent, Posner-Style: Judge Richard A Posner’s First Decade of
Dissenting Opinions, 1981-1991 – Toward an Aesthetic of Judicial Dissenting
Style.” Missouri Law Review 69 (2004): 73.
Butt, Simon. “Constitutional Court Lets Local Governments off the Leash.”
Indonesia at Melbourne, July 4, 2017. http://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.
edu.au/constitutional-court-lets-local-governments-off-the-leash/.
———. “Regional Autonomy and the Proliferation of Perda in Indonesia: An
Assessment of Bureaucratic and Judicial Review Mechanisms.” Sydney Law
Review vol 32(2) (2010): 177.
———. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Brill, 2015.
Butt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. Indonesian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Butt, Simon, and Nicholas Parsons. “Reining in Regional Governments? Local
Taxes and Investment in Decentralised Indonesia.” Sydney Law Review 34,
no. 1 (2012): 91–106.
Cole, David. “The Power of a Supreme Court Dissent.” Washington Post,
October 29, 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-power-ofa-
supreme-court-dissent/2015/10/29/fbc80acc-66cb-11e5-8325-a42b5a459b1e_
story.html?utm_term=.b392c62038be.
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. “The Role of Dissenting Opinions.” Minnesota Law Review
(1) (1999).
Jacobson, A. J. “Publishing Dissent.” Washington and Lee Law Review 62, no. 4
(2005): 1607–36.
Junaidi, Veri, Adelline Syahda, and Adam Mulya Bunga Mayang. Tiga Belas
Tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memutus Pengujian Undang-Undang.
Jakarta: Kode Inisiatif, 2016.
“Kontroversi Sebutir Pertimbangan.” Tempo Interaktif, February 21, 2005.
http://www.tempointeraktif.com/hg/mbmtempo/arsip/2005/02/21/HK/
mbm.20050221.hk1.id.html.
L’Heureux-Dube, Claire. “The Dissenting Opinion: Voice of the Future?” Osgoode
Hall Law Journal 38(3) (n.d.): 495–512.
Lynch, Andrew. “Is Judicial Dissent Constitutionally Protected?” Macquarie Law
Journal 4, (2004): 81–104.
Mahkamah Agung. Blueprint for the Reform of the Supreme Court of Indonesia.
Jakarta: Supreme Court of Indonesia, 2003.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar
Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil
Pembahasan, 1999-2002 - V: Pemilihan Umum. Revised edition. Jakarta:
Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan, Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.
Markesinis. “Conceptualism, Pragmatism and Courage: A Common Lawyer
Looks at Some Judgments of the German Federal Court.” American Journal
of Comparative Law 34 (1986): 349.
Mattei, Ugo. “Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law.”
American Journal of Comparative Law 42 (1994): 195.
Merryman, John. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems
of Western Europe and Latin America. 2nd ed. Stanford California: Stanford
University Press, 1985.
Rajagukguk, Erman. “Judicial Reform: A Proposal for the Future of the Commercial
Court.” In Indonesia: Bankruptcy, Law Reform & the Commercial Court:
Comparative Perspectives on Insolvency Law and Policy, edited by Tim
Lindsey. Sydney: Desert Pea Press, 2000.
Simmons, RG. “The Use and Abuse of Dissenting Opinions.” Louisiana Law
Review 16 (1956): 497.
Stephens, RB. “The Function of Concurring and Dissenting Opinions in Courts
of Last Resort.” University of Florida Law Review 5 (1952): 394.
Stone Sweet, Alec. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Wells, Michael. “French and American Judicial Opinions.” Yale Journal of
International Law 19, no. 1 (1994): 81–133.
Wijayanta, Tata, and Hery Firmansyah. Perbedaan Pendapat Dalam Putusan
Pengadilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev411
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1721 timesPDF view : 202 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Constitutional Review