Relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Legislators according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Fajar Laksono, Sudarsono Sudarsono, Arief Hidayat, Muchammad Ali Safaat


This research aims to analyze and to describe the relation between the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (CC) with the People Representatives’ Council and the President of the Republic of Indonesia as legislators by looking on implementation of CC’s decision through the legislation in the period 2004-2015. Using doctrinal research, it can be seen how the constitutional mandate in the CC’s decision are implemented by the legislator through the legislation. The results are: (a) legal opinions of the CC’s decision have a binding power; (b) a constitutional mandate in the legal opinion is intended as guidance for the legislators regarding what the 1945 Constitution requires; (c) directives to the legislator in the legal opinions should be implemented because it is the implementation of the principle of checks and balances according to the 1945 Constitution, (d) implementation of the CC’s decisions through legislation does not have standard mechanism and does not become the priority of legislation, and (e) relation between the CC with the legislators can not be categorized in black and white in cooperative or confrontative, but shows ups and downs between cooperative and confrontative relations. Cooperative relations are realized when the constitutional mandate is formulated strongly so it is implemented by the legislator as the formula. Relationships tend to be cooperative in the implementation of the constitutional mandate of the decision, but not a priority of legislation. Meanwhile, the confrontative relations is seen from the constitutional mandate of the CC decisions which are not implemented.


Relation; Constitutional Court; Legislator; Cooperative; Confrontative

Full Text:



Barrett, Kathleen. “Constitutional Courts, Legislative Autonomy, and Democracy: What Price Rights?” Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2014.

Brewer-Carias, Allan. “Constitutional Courts As Positive Legislators In Comparative Law.” In General Report on XVIII International Congress of Comparative Law. Washington, 2010.

Eschborn, Norbert. Tugas Dan Tantangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Negara-Negara Transformasi Dengan Contoh Indonesia. Jakarta: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2005.

Gumilang, Prima. “Perpres Pembentukan Dewan Kerukunan Tinggal Diteken Jokowi.” Cnnindonesia.Com. 2017.

Guttler, V. “Execution of Judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic.” Czech, 2000.

Harun, Refly. An interview, 2017.

Isra, Saldi. Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi, Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010.

———. “Purifikasi Proses Legislasi Melalui Pengujian Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 7, no. 1 (2010).

Judicial Review Number 30 of 2002 on Commission for the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption aganst the 1945 Constitution, No. 012–016–019/ PUU–IV/2006 (2006).

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State (20th Century Legal Philosophy Series Vol. I). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.

Kim, Jongcheo. “Some Problems with the Korean Constitutional Adjudication System.” Journal of Korean Law 1, no. 2 (2001).

Kūtris, Gunārs. “Authority of the Constitutional Court as the Preconditions of Execution of the Decisions.” In Execution of The Decisions of Constitutional Courts: A Cornerstone of The Process of Implementation of Constitutional Justice. Baku, 2008.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Surabaya: Kencana, 2005.

Paczolay, Péter. “Experience of the Execution of Constitutional Court’s Decisions Declaring Legislative Omission In Hungary.” Baku, 2008.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. An interview, 2017.

Santoni, Michelle, and Francesco Zucchini. “Legislative Output and the Constitutional Court in Italy.” Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 17, no. 3 (2006): 165–87.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (1945).

Vanberg, George Stephan. The Politics of Constitutional Review: Constitutional Court and Parliament in Germany. New York: University of Rochester Rochester, 1999.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 331 times
PDF view : 108 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Constitutional Review