The Dimension of Judicial Activism of Incorporating Constitutional Complaint: an Overview on Judicial Independence

Authors

  • Murti Ayu Hapsari Penn State Dickinson Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1124

Keywords:

Constitutional complaint, Judicial accountability, Judicial independence, Judicial restraint

Abstract

This paper analyzes the debate surrounding the potential for Indonesia’s Constitutional Court to incorporate a constitutional complaint mechanism. While acknowledging the strong arguments for its inclusion, which are deep-rooted in the need for substantive justice and the protection of fundamental rights, this paper advocates for a cautious approach. The core argument is that the Court should refrain from expanding its jurisdiction through judicial interpretation alone. Such an act could be viewed as judicial overreach, potentially undermining the Court’s legitimacy, disrupting the separation of powers, and weakening the principles of judicial accountability and judicial independence. Drawing on the historical context of human rights in Indonesia and the foundational design of the Constitutional Court, this analysis suggests that a legitimate expansion of authority should be achieved through formal, democratic processes, such as a constitutional amendment or a revision of the Constitutional Court Law. By advocating for judicial restraint, the paper emphasizes that the Court’s strength and independence lies not in expanding its own power, but in strictly adhering to its constitutional mandate as a check on other branches of government. The paper concludes that not exercising restraint by incorporating a constitutional complaint mechanism through the Court’s interpretative authority can lead to long-term negative effects on the Court’s judicial independence, both in theory and practice.

References

Arundhati, Gautama Budi. “Kemungkinan Penerapan Preliminary Ruling Procedure Sebagai Media Constitutional Complaint di Mahkamah Konstitusi [The Possibility of Implementing Preliminary Ruling Procedure as a Medium for Constitutional Complaints in the Constitutional Court].” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 4 (2017): 820-837, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1446.

Baidhowah, Adfin Rochmad. “Defender of Democracy: The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Preventing Rapid Democratic Backsliding.” Constitutional Review 7, no. 1 (2021): 124-152, https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev715.

Burbank, Stephen B. “Judicial Independence, Judicial Accountability, and Interbranch Relations.” Georgetown Law Journal 95, no. 4 (2007), https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.922091.

Butt, Simon. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2023.

Butt, Simon. “The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia.” In Indonesia: Law and Society, edited by Timothy Lindsey, 47-55. Sydney: Federation Press, 2012.

Butt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. The Constitution of Indonesia: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.

Chakim, M. Lutfi. “A Comparative Perspective on Constitutional Complaint: Discussing Models, Procedures, and Decisions.” Constitutional Review 5, no. 1 (2019): 96-133, https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev514.

Chalid, Hamid, and Arief Ainul Yaqin. “Menggagas Pelembagaan Constitutional Question Melalui Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menguji Undang-Undang [Initiating the Institutionalization of Constitutional Questions by Expanding the Authority of the Constitutional Court in Reviewing Laws].” Jurnal Konstitusi 16, no. 2 (2019): 363-390, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1628.

Congress. “Judicial Overreach and Constitutional Limits on the Federal Courts.” House Judiciary Committee, 119th Congress, 1st sess., published April 1, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/LC74362/text.

Cremades, J., and C. Hermida, eds. Encyclopedia of Contemporary Constitutionalism. Cham: Springer, 2021.

Dinh, Viet D. “Threats to Judicial Independence, Real and Imagined.” Georgetown Law Journal 95, no. 4 (2007): 905-917, https://www.jstor.org/stable/40544060.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “A Prospect and Challenges for Adopting Constitutional Complaint and Constitutional Question in the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 1 (2016): 103-128, https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev215.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “The Protection of Civil and Political Rights by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia.” Indonesia Law Review 6, no. 2 (2016): 162-176, https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v6n2.230.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Masa Depan Constitutional Complaint [The Future of Constitutional Complaint].” Konstitusi (Jakarta), November 2020.

Ferejohn, John A., and Larry D. Kramer. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint.” New York University Law Review 77, no. 4 (2002): 962-1037.

French, Robert AC. “The Australian Experience: Constitutional Courts-The Rule of Law.” In Courts and Diversity: Twenty Years of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia, edited by Bertus de Villiers et al., vol. 12, 283-294. Leiden: Brill, 2024.

Gaffar, M. Janedjri. “Peran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Terkait Penyelenggaraan Pemilu [The Role of Constitutional Court Decisions in Protecting Human Rights Related to Election Implementation].” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 1 (2016): 1-32, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1011.

Hamilton, Alexander. “The Federalist No. 78.” Accessed September 3, 2025. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/text-71-80#s-lg-box-wrapper-25493470.

Hamidah, Haura. “Tanggapan DPR dan Pemerintah atas Putusan MK Soal Pemilu [The House and the Government’s Response to the Constitutional Court’s Decision on Elections].” Tempo. Accessed September 1, 2025. https://www.tempo.co/politik/tanggapan-dpr-dan-pemerintah-atas-putusan-mk-soal-pemilu--183168.

Hendrianto, S. Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts: Indonesia and the Search for Judicial Heroes. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315100043.

Holish, Amarru Mutfie, and Aulia Maharani. “Strengthening Constitutional Complaint Authority: Enhancing Citizens’ Constitutional Rights Protection in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 4, no. 3 (2023): 347-364, https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i3.68129.

Isra, Saldi, and Pan Mohamad Faiz. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court: An Overview.” In Courts and Diversity: Twenty Years of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia, edited by Bertus de Villiers et al., vol. 12, 55-94. Leiden: Brill, 2024.

Jain, Nishant. “Judicial Power: From Judicial Review to Judicial Overreach.” Indian Journal of Public Administration 56, no. 2 (2017): 331-342, https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120100211.

Judicial Review of Constitutional Court Law, Decision of Constitutional Court No. 001/PUU-IV/2006 (The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 2006).

Krisdanar, Vino Devanta Anjas. “Menggagas Constitutional Complaint Dalam Memproteksi Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Mengenai Kehidupan dan Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia [Initiating a Constitutional Complaint to Protect the Constitutional Rights of the Community Regarding Life and Freedom of Religion in Indonesia].” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2016): 185-208, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk737.

Lailam, Tanto, and Nita Andrianti. “Legal Policy of Constitutional Complaints in Judicial Review: A Comparison of Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Indonesia.” Bestuur 11, no. 1 (2023): 75-94, https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70052.

Lailam, Tanto, et al. “The Proposal of Constitutional Complaint for the Indonesian Constitutional Court.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 3 (2022): 693-719, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1939.

Lubis, Todung Mulya. Mencari HAM: Hak Asasi Manusia: Dilema Politik Hukum Indonesia Masa Orde Baru 1966-1990 [In Search of Human Rights: Legal-political Dilemmas of Indonesia’s New Order, 1966-1990]. Yogyakarta: Circa, 2021.

Mahfud MD, Mohammad. “Rambu Pembatas dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi [Limiting Signs and Expansion of the Authority of the Constitutional Court].” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 16, no. 4 (2009): 441-462, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss4.art1.

Martitah. “Progresivitas Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Membuat Putusan (Analisis Terhadap Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Positive Legislature) [Progressiveness of Constitutional Court Judges in Making Decisions (Analysis of the Existence of Constitutional Court Decisions that are Positive Legislature)].” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 41, no. 2 (2012): 315-325, https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.41.2.2012.315-325.

Moses, Margaret L. “Beyond Judicial Activism: When the Supreme Court is No Longer a Court.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 14, no. 1 (2011): 161, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jcl/vol14/iss1/3/.

Nafisah, Ratu Durotun. “Excessive Reliance on Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Tactic to Avoid Democratic Accountability?” Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 10, no. 1 (2023): 97, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4832652.

Nasution, Adnan Buyung. Aspirasi Pemerintahan Konstitusional di Indonesia: Studi Sosio-Legal atas Konstituante 1956-1959 [The Aspiration for Constitutional Government in Indonesia: A Socio-legal Study of the Indonesian Konstituante 1956-1959]. Jakarta: Grafiti, 1995.

Nugroho, Adrianto Dwi, et al. “The Need for A Constitutional Complaint Mechanism for Tax Matters in Indonesia.” Constitutional Review 9, no. 2 (2023): 358-390, https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev926.

Nurwulantari, Yunita, and Anna Erliyana. “Menimbang Model Pengujian Keputusan Pejabat Publik Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia Dan Korea Selatan) [Considering the Model of Testing Public Officials’ Decisions by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (Comparative Study of Indonesia and South Korea)].”

Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1 (2021): 168-194, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1818.

Oktavinanda, Pramudya A. “Is The Conditionally Constitutional Doctrine Constitutional?” Indonesia Law Review 8, no. 1 (2018): 17-36, https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v8n1.381.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Constitutional Complaint and the Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights.” Constitutional Review 3, no. 1 (2017): 1-23, https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev311.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Overcoming Constitutional Obstacles in Dealing with Constitutional Complaint Issues: Indonesia’s Experience.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on Constitutional Complaint, Jakarta, August 2015.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. “Yang ‘Terlepas’ Dari Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI: Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint) [Those ‘Separated’ from the Authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia: Constitutional Complaints].” Lex Jurnalica 3, no. 3 (2006): 128-136, https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v3i3.250.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi [Regulation of the Constitutional Court Number 1 of 2023 on the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court].

Rayestu, Nathaniel. “When the Court Writes the Law: MK’s Judicial Overreach.” Think Policy Indonesia (blog). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-court-writes-law-mks-judicial-overreach-thinkpolicyid-r38qc/.

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

The Constitution of the United States of America.

Wicaksono, Dian Agung, et al. “Mencari Jejak Konsep Judicial Restraint Dalam Praktik Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia [In Search of Traces of the Concept of Judicial Restraint in the Practice of Judicial Power in Indonesia].” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 1 (2021): 177-203, https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no1.3014.

Whittington, Keith E. Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2019.

Yung, Rayburn Yung. “Flexing Judicial Muscle: An Empirical Study of Judicial Activism in the Federal Courts.” Northwestern University Law Review 105, no. 1 (2011): 1-60, https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol105/iss1/1.

Yunus, Sapto. “Mengapa DPR Anggap Putusan MK Soal Pemilu Salahi Konstitusi? [Why the House of Representatives Considers the Constitutional Court’s Election Decision Unconstitutional].” Tempo. Accessed September 2, 2025.

https://www.tempo.co/politik/mengapa-dpr-anggap-putusan-mk-soal-pemilu-salahi-konstitusi-2015693.

Zoelva, Hamdan. “Constitutional Complaint, Constitutional Question and Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights.” Jurnal Media Hukum 19, no. 1 (2012): 152-165, https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v19i1.1984.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Murti Ayu Hapsari. (2025). The Dimension of Judicial Activism of Incorporating Constitutional Complaint: an Overview on Judicial Independence. Constitutional Review, 11(2), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1124

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.