Threat to Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Independence Posed by Religious Populist Movements and its Implication Towards Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1022Keywords:
Independence of Constitutional Court, Indonesia, Religious Populist Movements, Right to Freedom of Religion, Rule of LawAbstract
One of the biggest challenges to a democratic state under the rule of law today is rising populist movements that endanger the independence of the judiciary. In Indonesia, the religious populist movement led by hardliner Islamic groups continues to try to enter courtrooms to advocate for religious interpretations of court decisions, such as when the Indonesian Constitutional Court reviews the 1965 anti-blasphemy law. This socio-legal research examines empirical data from key resource interviews and secondary data from related Constitutional Court judgements, pertinent legislation, and public policies to determine the socio-political backdrop of the Court decision. This technique enables the author to evaluate religious populism and how it affects Constitutional Court rulings. Political pressure may weaken the court, according to this research, encourage the religious populism of the former of Islamic Defenders Front to impose its will by stating that the repeal of the Anti-Blasphemy Law shows strong indications of corruption within the Court. Religious populism in the justice system raises concerns about political or religious decision-making, thereby undermining the rule of law. This research shows that the pattern or tendency of religious populism shows the Court’s compromise of the legal system towards democratic government in Indonesia, eroding the independence of the judiciary, endangering the right to religious freedom, and weakening public confidence in the justice system and democracy.
References
Ahnaf, M. Iqbal, and Danielle N. Lussier. “Religious Leaders and Elections in the Polarizing Context of Indonesia.” Humaniora 31, no. 3 (2019): 227–240. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v31i3.45692.
Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers, eds. Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005.
Barton, Greg, Ihsan Yilmaz, and Nicholas Morieson. “Religious and Pro-Violence Populism in Indonesia: The Rise and Fall of a Far-Right Islamist Civilisationist Movement.” Religions 12, no. 6 (2021): 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060397.
Butt, Simon. “The Function of Judicial Dissent in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court.” Constitutional Review 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev411.
Chadwick, Andrew, and Jennifer Stromer-Galley. “Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns: Party Decline or Party Renewal?” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21, no. 3 (2016): 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731.
Corl, James, and Muhsin Yunus Sozen. “The Effect of Populism on American and Turkish Judiciaries.” Journal of Student Research 11, no. 1 (2022): 18–28.
Crouch, Melissa A. “Law and Religion in Indonesia: The Constitutional Court and the Blasphemy Law.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 7 (2012): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/1932-0205.1391.
Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “Independence of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Norms and Practices.” Constitutional Review 3, no. 1 (2017): 71–97. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev312.
Fischer, Meghan. “Hate Speech Laws and Blasphemy Laws: Parallels Show Problems with the UN Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech.” Emory International Law Review 35 (2021): 177–212.
Forte, David F. “Apostasy and Blasphemy in Pakistan.” Connecticut Journal of International Law 10 (1994): 27–68.
Harsono, Andreas. “Indonesia to Expand Abusive Blasphemy Law: Revoke New Provisions Violating Basic Rights.” Human Rights Watch, October 31, 2019. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/10/31/indonesia-expand-abusive-blasphemy-law.
Harkusha, Vyacheslav. “The Principle of Independence of the Judiciary as the Basis of a Democratic Society.” Naukovyy Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’kogo Derzhavnogo Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav 1, no. 1 (2021): 72–76. https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2021-1-72-76.
Haryatmoko, Johannes. “The Pathology of Tribal Nationalism According to Hannah Arendt: Uncovering Religious Populism Mechanisms Which Jeopardize Cultural Diversity.” Jurnal Kawistara 9, no. 1 (2019): 60–77.
Hong, Carissa Patricia, Luverne Pujian Quinn, Jelita Safitri Ananda, Omega Kharisma, and Tundjung Herning Sitabuana. “Review of the Authority of the House of Representatives in Removing Constitutional Court Judges.” QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2023): 768–771.
Isra, Saldi. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia [The Role of the Constitutional Court in Strengthening Human Rights in Indonesia].” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 3 (2014): 409–427.
Jaffrey, Sana. “Right-Wing Populism and Vigilante Violence in Asia.” Studies in Comparative International Development 56, no. 2 (2021): 223–249.
Luthfi, Muhamad, Rusydan Fathy, and Mohammad Faisal Asadi. “GNPF MUI: Strategi Pembingkaian dan Keberhasilan Gerakan Populis Islam di Indonesia [GNPF MUI: Framing Strategies and the Success of Islamic Populist Movements in Indonesia].” Asketik: Jurnal Agama dan Perubahan Sosial 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–15.
Mietzner, Marcus, and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. “Explaining the 2016 Islamist Mobilisation in Indonesia: Religious Intolerance, Militant Groups and the Politics of Accommodation.” Asian Studies Review 42, no. 3 (2018): 479–497.
Mietzner, Marcus, and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. “The Myth of Pluralism: Nahdlatul Ulama and the Politics of Religious Tolerance in Indonesia.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 42, no. 1 (2020): 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs42-1c.
Ningrum, Dian Ayu Widya, Al Khanif, and Antikowati. “Format Ideal Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk Mengefektifkan Asas Erga Omnes [Ideal Format for Follow-up on Constitutional Court Decisions to Effectively Implement the Erga Omnes Principle].” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 313–332. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1924.
O’Donnell, Guillermo. “Why the Rule of Law Matters.” Journal of Democracy 15, no. 4 (2004): 32–46.
Porat, Guy Ben, and Dani Filc. “Remember to Be Jewish: Religious Populism in Israel.” Politics and Religion 15, no. 1 (2022): 61–84.
Pratiwi, Cekli S. “Rethinking the Constitutionality of Indonesia’s Flawed Anti- Blasphemy Law.” Constitutional Review 7, no. 2 (2021): 273–299. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev724.
Rezah, Farah Syah, and Andi Tenri Sapada. “The Independence and Accountability of the Constitutional Court in the Constitutional System in Indonesia.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 2 (2022): 247–260.
Rosenfeld, Michel. “The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy.” Southern California Law Review 74, no. 5 (2001): 1307–1351.
Satriawan, Iwan, Seokmin Lee, Septi Nur Wijayanti, and Beni Hidayat. “An Evaluation of the Selection Mechanism of Constitutional Judges in Indonesia and South Korea.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 10, no. 1 (2023): 122–147.
Sunardi, Sunardi. “Islamic Populism: Asymmetrical, Multi-Class Coalition-Based Social Mobilization.” Jurnal Politik 4, no. 2 (2019): 243–269.
Sumadi, Ahmad Fadlil. “Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi [Independence of the Constitutional Court].” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 5 (2011): 631–648.
Widian, Rizky, Putu Agung Nara Indra Prima Satya, and Sylvia Yazid. “Religion in Indonesia’s Elections: An Implementation of a Populist Strategy?” Politics and Religion 16, no. 2 (2023): 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048321000195.
Wijanarko, Robertus. “Religious Populism and Public Sphere in Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora 12, no. 1 (2021): 1–9.
Yilmaz, Ihsan, and Nicholas Morieson. “A Systematic Literature Review of Populism, Religion and Emotions.” Religions 12, no. 4 (2021): 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12040272.
Yilmaz, Ihsan, Nicholas Morieson, and Hasnan Bachtiar. “Civilizational Populism in Indonesia: The Case of Front Pembela Islam (FPI).” Religions 13, no. 12 (2022): 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13121208.
