The Vocabulary of Right Under the Indonesian Constitution: A Hohfeldian Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1018Keywords:
Constitution, Hohfeld, Interpretation, Legal Concept, RightAbstract
This article demonstrates how the Indonesian Constitutional Court interprets the term 'right' when deciding issue-level questions involving constitutional doctrine. In doing so, we employ the Hohfeldian scheme that configures right into four different meanings of claim right, privilege, power, and immunity. By looking at the molecular configuration of rights in the context of freedom of religion, natural resource control, educational policies, and fair trial, this we contend that the right under the constitution is interpreted by the Court in a dynamic-yet-configured fashion. In this sense, 'dynamic' implies that the Court's interpretation does not adhere to a fixed or consistent vocabulary, while 'configured' suggests that the vocabulary of right is fundamentally configured by both (1) non-relational liberty and (2) power that provides intervention, limitations, or even change over the nature of liberty into liability (i.e., duty to refrain from acting in a certain way). It is manifest that right is hardly expounded by the Court when the term is juxtaposed with any relevant governmental duties and powers. This demonstrates a judicial fabrication of a flexible legal concept used by the judicial authority to justify certain normative objectives.
References
AlAfghani, Mohamad Mova. "Strengths and Limitations of The Indonesian Constitutional Court's '6 Basic Principles' in Resolving Water Conflicts." Constitutional Review 9, no. 1 (2023): 179-220, http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/ consrev916.
Alexy, Robert. "Discourse Theory and Fundamental Rights." In Arguing Fundamental Rights, edited by Agustín José Menéndez and Erik Oddvar Eriksen, 15-30. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
Andreopoulos, George, and Zehra F Kabasakal Arat. "On the Uses and Misuses of Human Rights: A Critical Approach to Advocacy." In The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights, 1-27. New York: Springer, 2014.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia [Indonesian Constitution and Constitutionalism]. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Bix, Brian. "HLA Hart and the Hermeneutic Turn in Legal Theory." Southern Methodist University Law Review 52 (1999): 167, https://ssrn.com/ abstract=163810.
Bourchier, David. Illiberal Democracy in Indonesia: The Ideology of the Family State. London & New York: Routledge, 2014.
Brown, Vivienne. "Rights, Liberties and Duties: Reformulating Hohfeld's Scheme of Legal Relations?" Current Legal Problems 58, no. 1 (2005): 343-67, https:// doi.org/10.1093/clp/58.1.343.
Butt, Simon. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 001-021-022/PUU-1/2003 (2003).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 058-059-060-063/PUU-1I/2004 (2005).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 006/PUU-III/2005 (2005).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 008/PUU-III/2005 (2005).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 11/PUU-V/2007 (2007).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 11-14-21-126-136/PUU/VII/2009 (2010).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 140/PUU-VII/2009 (2010).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 (2010).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 36/PUU-X/2012 (2012).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 35/PUU-X/2012 (2013).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 34/PUU-X1/2013 (2013).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 85/PUU-XI/2013 (2014).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 80/PUU-XVII/2019 (2019).
Constitutional Court, Decision no. 11-14-21-126-136/PUU/VII/2019 (2019).
Curran, Eleanor. "Hobbes's Theory of Rights - A Modern Interest Theory." The Journal of Ethics 6 (2002): 63-86, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015875902334.
D'Almeida, Luís Duarte. "Fundamental Legal Concepts: The Hohfeldian Framework." Philosophy Compass 11, no. 10 (2016): 554-69, https://doi. org/10.111/phc3.12342.
Duffel, Siegfried Van. "The Nature of Rights Debate Rests on a Mistake." Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2012): 104-23, https://doi.org/10.11/j.1468-0114.2011.01418.x.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
El-Muhtaj, Majda. Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi Indonesia /Human Rights in the Indonesian Constitution/. Jakarta: Kencana, 2015.
Epstein, Lee, and Keren Weinshall. The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Fontaneau, Francois A. "The Right to Religious Freedom & the Hohfeldian Analysis of Rights." Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 3, no. 1 (2013): 92-99, https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/ solidarity/vol3/iss1/7.
Hendrianto, Stefanus. "Constitutionalized But Not Constitute: The Case of Right to Social Security in Indonesia." Constitutional Review 6, no. 2 (December 2020): 241, http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/consrev623.
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning: And Other Legal Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1923.
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. "Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning." The Yale Law Journal 23, no. 1 (1913): 16-59, https:// doi.org/10.2307/785533.
Holzhacker, Ronald. "Gay Rights Are Human Rights: The Framing of New Interpretations of International Human Rights Norms". In The Uses and Misuses of Human Rights: A Critical Approach to Advocacy, edited by George Andreopoulos and Zehra F. Kabasakal Arat, 29-64. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
Law No. 20 of 2003 on National Education System (2003).
Lazarev, Nikolai. "Hohfeld's Analysis of Rights: An Essential Approach to a Conceptual and Practical Understanding of the Nature of Rights." Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 12, no. 1 (2005), https://dx.doi. org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.060308.
Markovich, R'eka. "Understanding Hofeld and Formalizing Legal Rights: The Hohfeldian Conceptions and Their Conditional Consequences." Studia Logica 108 (2020): 131, https://doi.org/10.1007/511225-019-09870-5.
O'Rourke, Allen Thomas. "Refuge from a Jurisprudence of Doubt: Hohfeldian Analysis of Constitutional Law." South Carolina Law Review 61, NO. 1 (2009): 141-70, https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr/vol61/iss1/5.
Omara, Andy. "Enforcing Nonjusticiable Rights in Indonesia." Constitutional Review 6, no. 2 (December 2020): 311, http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/consrev625.
Partain, Roy Andrew. "Creating Rights, Terminating Rights, Overcoming Legal Conflicts." Constitutional Review 8, no. 2 (December 2022): 215, http://dx.doi. org/10.31078/consrev822.
Penner, J.E. Hohfeldian Liberties, Property Rights: A Re-Examination. Online edn. Oxford: Oxford Academic, 2020.
Rachman, Irfan Nur. "Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Menurut Pasal 33 UUD 1945 Legal Politics of Natural Resources Management According to Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution," Constitutional Journal]," Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 1 (2016): 191-212, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1319.
Safaat, Muchamad Ali. "The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations." Constitutional Review 8, no. 1 (May 2022): 113-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/consrev815.
Smith, Carel. "The Vicissitudes of the Hermeneutic Paradigm in the Study of Law: Tradition, Forms of Life and Metaphor." Erasmus Law Review 4 (2011): 21, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1924860.
Sreenivasan, Gopal. "Duties and Their Direction." Ethics 120, no. 3 (April 2010):
-494, https://doi.org/10.1086/652303.
Sunstein, Cass R. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Vasandani, Malika Rajan, Dwi Putra Nugraha, and Susi Susantijo. "Affirmative Action Study on the Political Rights of Women in the Indonesian Constitution." Constitutional Review 8, no. 1 (May 2022): 62, http://dx.doi. org/10.31078/consrev813.
Westen, Peter. "Poor Wesley Hohfeld." San Diego Law Review 55 (2018): 449-68, https://digital.sandiego.edu/sdlr/vol55/iss2/11.
