The Constitutional Court and Forest Tenure Conflicts in Indonesia

Yance Arizona, Umi Illiyina

Abstract


With regard to access to land and forest resources, forestry legislation maintains an imbalance between the state, corporations, and local communities. Since the colonial era, forestry regulation has facilitated restrictions on the ability of local communities to benefit from land and forest resources, while also concentrating power in the hands of the state. To uphold state ownership, forestry law criminalizes customary practices, putting local communities at risk. In this sense, conflicts between local communities, corporations, and government agencies arise because of structural issues in the legal framework of laws and regulations that undermine the land rights of local communities. The establishment of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia in 2003 has enabled local communities and NGOs to challenge the Forestry Law. They use the Constitutional Court to support the resolution of forestry tenure conflicts. This article examines the extent to which the Constitutional Court can contribute to the resolution of forest tenure conflicts through judicial review of forest laws. This article discusses twelve Constitutional Court decisions regarding judicial review of the Forestry Law and the Law on Forest Destruction Prevention and Eradication. We found that the Constitutional Court has made a positive contribution to addressing the deficiency of forest legislation regarding local and customary land rights. The implementation of Constitutional Court’s ruling is not, however, a matter of self-implementation. The ruling of the Constitutional Court will only have significance if it is continuously promoted by various stakeholders in support of forest tenure reform to facilitate the resolution of forest tenure conflicts.


Keywords


Constitutional Court; Customary Land Rights; Forestry Law; Forest Tenure Conflicts; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afiff, Suraya, and Noer Fauzi Rachman. “Institutional Activism: Seeking Customary Forest Rights Recognition from Within the Indonesian State.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 20, no. 5 (2019): 453-70, https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670245.

Arizona, Yance. “Rethinking Adat Strategies: Politics of State Recognition of Customary Land Rights in Indonesia.” PhD diss., Leiden University, 2022.

Arizona, Yance, Malik, and Lucy Ishimora. “Pengakuan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat Adat: Trend Produk Hukum Daerah dan Nasional Paska Putusan MK 35/PUU-X/2012 [The Legal Recognition of Adat Communities: The Trend of Local and National Regulation after Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012].” Outlook Epistema 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31961.67689.

Arizona, Yance, Siti Rakhma Mary, and Grahat Nagara. Anotasi Putusan MK No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 Mengenai Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Kawasan Hutan dalam Pasal 1 Angka 3 UU No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan [Annotation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 Regarding Testing of the Constitutionality of Forest Areas in Article 1 Number 3 of Law no. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry]. Jakarta: Perkumpulan HuMa [HuMa Association], 2012.

Arizona, Yance, Siti Rakhma Mary Herwati, and Erasmus Cahyadi. Kembalikan Hutan Adat kepada Masyarakat Hukum Adat: Anotasi Putusan MK No. 35/ PUU-X/2012 Mengenai Pengujian UU No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan [Return Customary Forests to Customary Law Communities: Annotation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 Regarding Review of Law No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry]. Jakarta: Perkumpulan HuMa, Epistema Institute, and Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara [HuMa Association, Epistema Institute, and Alliance of Indigenous Peoples of the Archipelago], 2014.

Arizona, Yance, Erasmus Cahyadi, and Malik. Mengakhiri Rezim Kriminalisasi Kehutanan: Anotasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 95/PUU- XII/2014 Mengenai Pengujian UU No. 18 Tahun 2013 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan, serta UU No. 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan [Ending the Criminalization Regime of Forestry: Annotation of Constitutional Court Decision No. 95/PUU-XII/2014 Regarding the Judicial Review of Law No. 18 of 2013 on the Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, and Law No. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry]. Jakarta: Epistema Institute and AMAN, 2015.

Arizona, Yance. Konstitusionalisme Agraria [Agrarian Constitutionalism]. Yogyakarta: STPN Press, 2014.

Arizona, Yance. Erasmus Cahyadi and Malik. Banyak Perubahan Tetapi Tidak Banyak yang Berubah: Refleksi 2 Tahun Putusan MK 35 [Many Changes, But Not Much Has Changed: Reflection on 2 Years of Constitutional Court Decision 35]. Jakarta: AMAN and Epistema Institute, 2015.

Arizona, Yance, Muki Trenggono Wicaksono, and Jacqueline Vel. “The Role of Indigeneity NGOs in the Legal Recognition of Adat Communities and Customary Forests in Indonesia.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 20, no. 5 (2019): 487-506, https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670241.

Boomgaard, Peter. “Forest Management and Exploitation in Colonial Java, 1677-1897.” Forest & Conservation History 36, no. 1 (1992): 4–14, https://doi.org/10.2307/3983978.

Burns, Peter. The Leiden Legacy: Concepts of Law in Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV, 2004.

Cahyono, Eko. et, al. Evaluasi Konflik Agraria Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Kawasan Hutan [Evaluation of Agrarian Conflicts of Indigenous Communities in Forest Areas]. Jakarta: National Commission on Human Rights, 2016.

Colchester, Marcus. “Sustaining the Forests: The Community-Based Approach in South and South-East Asia.” Development and Change 25, no. 1 (1994): 69-100, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00510.x.

Colchester, Marcus. “Indigenous Peoples and Communal Tenures in Asia.” Environmental Science & Policy 7, no. 3 (June 2004): 145-53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.02.004.

Diantoro, Totok Dwi. “Dinamika Kebijakan Resolusi Konflik Tenurial Kawasan Hutan Era Joko Widodo [Dynamics of Forest Area Tenurial Conflict Resolution Policy in the Joko Widodo Era].” Media of Law and Sharia 1, no. 4 (2020): 245-46, https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v1i4.10272.

Fasseur, Cees. “Purse or Principle: Dutch Colonial Policy in the 1860s and the Decline of the Cultivation System.” Modern Asian Studies 25, no. 1 (1991): 33-52, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00015833.

Fay, Chip, and Ho-Ming So Denduangrudee. “Emerging Options for the Recognition and Protection of Indigenous Community Rights in Indonesia.” In Land and Development in Indonesia: Searching for the People’s Sovereignty, edited by John McCharty and Kathryn Robinson. Singapore: ISEAS, 2016.

Furnivall, John Sydenham. Colonial Policy and Practice: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India. Cambridge: New York, 1948.

Forest Watch Indonesia. The State of the Forest: Indonesia. Bogor: Forest Watch Indonesia and Washington DC: Global Forest Watch, 2002.

Ginsburg, Tom, and Mila Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 30, no. 3 (2014): 587-622. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewt008.

Hardjodarsono, Soenarjo. Sejarah Kehutanan Indonesia I: Periode Reasejarah - Tahun 1942 [History of Indonesian Forestry I: The Historical Period – 1942]. Jakarta: Departemen Kehutanan [Forestry Department], 1986.

Lund, Christian. “Of What Is This a Case?: Analytical Movements in Qualitative Social Science Research.” Human Organization 73, no. 3 (2014): 224–34, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44148783.

Mary, Siti Rakhma, Dhani Armanto, and Lukito. Dominasi dan Resistensi Pengelolaan Hutan di Jawa Tengah: Studi Kasus di 4 Kabupaten [Dominance and Resistance in Forest Management in Central Java: Case Studies in 4 Districts]. Jakarta: Perkumpulan HuMa [HuMa Association], 2007.

Peluso, Nancy Lee, and Peter Vandergeest. “Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand.” The Journal of Asian Studies 60, no. 3 (2001): 761–812, https://doi.org/10.2307/2700109.

Peluso, Nancy Lee. “The History of State Forest Management in Colonial Java.” Forest & Conservation History 35, no. 2 (1991): 65-75, https://doi.org/10.2307/3983940

Peluso, Nancy Lee. Rich Forests, Poor People: Forest Access Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press, 1992.

Rachman, Noer Fauzi and Hasriady Masalam. “The Trajectory of Indigeneity Politics Against Land Dispossession in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 1, no. 1 (2017): 122-42, https://doi.org/10.28946/SLREV.VOL1.ISS1.13.PP122-142.

Rachman, Noer Fauzi, and Mia Siscawati. “Forestry Law, Masyarakat Adat [Indigenous Community] and Struggles for Inclusive Citizenship in Indonesia.” In Routledge Handbook in Asian Law, edited by Christopher Antons. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

Safitri, Myrna Asfinawati. “Forest Tenure in Indonesia: The Socio-Legal Challenges of Securing Communities’ Rights.” PhD diss., Van Vollenhoven Institute, Leiden University, 2010.

Safitri, Myrna Asfinawati, et al. Menuju Kepastian dan Keadilan Tenurial [Towards Tenure Certainty and Justice]. Jakarta: Kelompok Masyarakat Sipil untuk Reformasi Tenurial [Civil Society Group for Tenurial Reform], 2011.

Safitri, Myrna Asfinawati. ““Dividing the Land: Legal Gaps in the Recognition of Customary Land in Indonesian Forest Areas.” Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of World Studies 30, no. (2)-31(1) (2015): 31-48, https://www.journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/kasarinlan/article/view/5705.

Siscawati, Mia, et al. “Overview of Forest Tenure Reforms in Indonesia.” Working Paper 223, Center for International Forestry Research, 2017.

Siscawati, Mia. “Social Movements and Scientific Forestry: Examining the Community Forestry in Indonesia.” PhD diss., University of Washington, 2012.

SOIFO. The State of Indonesia’s Forest 2020. Jakarta: The Ministry of Environment and Forestry, 2020.

Termorshuzen-Arts, Marjanne. “Rakyat Indonesia dan Tanahnya: Perkembangan Doktrin Domein di Masa Kolonial dan Pengaruhnya dalam Hukum Agraria Indonesia [The Indonesian People and Their Land: The Development of the Domain Doctrine in the Colonial Period and its Influence on Indonesian Agrarian Law].” In Hukum Agraria dan Masyarakat di Indonesia [Agrarian Law and Society in Indonesia], edited by Myrna Safitri and Tristam Moeliono, 65. Jakarta: HuMa, Van Vollenhoven Institute-Leiden University, KITLV-

Jakarta, 2010.

Vandergeest, Peter and Nancy Lee Peluso. “Empires of Forestry: Professional Forestry and State Power in Southeast Asia, Part 1.” Environment and History 12, no. 1 (2006): 31–64, http://dx.doi.org/10.3197/096734006776026809.

Vandergeest, Peter and Nancy Lee Peluso. “Territorialization and State Power in Thailand.” Theory and Society 24, no. 3 (1995): 385-426, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993352.

Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional: Dinamika Sosial-Politik dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia [From Colonial Law to National Law: Socio-Political Dynamics in the Development of Law in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Asosiasi HuMa [HuMa Association], 2014.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1014

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 138 times
PDF view : 37 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Constitutional Review